SWEP verwendet Cookies, um Ihnen den Besuch unserer Web-Seiten so angenehm wie möglich zu machen. Durch die Nutzung unseres Services gehen wir davon aus, dass Sie der Verwendung von Cookies zustimmen. Weitere Informationen zum Datenschutz erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

1.6 Co-versus counter-current flow

The flows inside a heat exchanger can be arranged in various ways to fulfil different purposes. The possibilities are counter-current flow, co-current flow and cross-flow, the first two of which are shown in Figure 1.8. There are different forms of so-called cross-flow heat exchangers in which the flows are more or less mutually perpendicular.

In brazed plate heat exchangers, counter-current flow is by far the most c​ommon arrangement. In this case, it is possible for the cooling liquid to leave at a higher temperature than the heating liquid outlet temperature. One of the great advantages of counter-current flow is the possibility of extracting a higher proportion of the heat content of the heating fluid. It is important to note that the LMTD value for counter-current flow is much larger than for cocurrent flow at the same terminal temperature (see Figure 1.9).

The motive for using counter-current flow becomes obvious by referring to equation 6. A high LMTD implies that a smaller heat transfer area is needed, i.e. the brazed plate heat exchanger can be manufactured with fewer plates. However, co-current flow also occurs in brazed plate heat exchangers when the application so demands, e.g. in flooded evaporators. A consequence of a co-current arrangement is that the outlet temperature of the cooling medium can never exceed the outlet temperature of the warming medium. It is also worth noting that in a cocurrent arrangement there is a large temperature gradient at the beginning of the heat exchanger, which makes boiling start earlier.​

<< back | next​​​​​​​ >>